Health Insurance Turned Upside Down

I believe we need to move away from a health model that rewards procedures and disease and towards a model that promotes wellness. In order to accomplish an abstract, long term goal involving multiple stakeholders it is best to allow them to solve the problem themselves. But when each stakeholder is fighting to maintain status quo and surrender as little as possible it creates stagnation. Rather than regulate heavily- which is where the current administration is heading- my suggestion is to adjust the playing field to incentivize the stakeholders. Rather than a level playing field with a tug-of-war pulling on 'healthcare' , tilt the field so that all the players end up on the same side and are pulling in the same direction- not against one another. An initial step would be to adjust the insurance company's relationships with one another so that their interests align with making people healthier.

In order to promote wellness and get the health insurance industry focused on keeping people 'well' as opposed to treating illness after it occurs, then something fundamental needs to be done. Why should an insurance company receive premiums for months or years and rarely pay a claim because of 'luck' ? And is it not the 'fear' of being stuck with an enormous bill for a patient that drives the process of 'underwriting'? Underwriting is expensive, labor intensive, slow and wasteful.

I suggest that the insurance company which has been covering the person for the longer time should pay a portion of the claims that occurs after the person changes insurances. That would make the insurance company that received the most monthly premiums contribute more fairly when an illness occurs. If the first insurance company was responsible for a portion of any claim for a period of time after their coverage ended - let's say one or two years- then they would have a stronger interest in keeping that patient healthy in the long run. During their own coverage period they would make more of an effort to do so. And the second insurance company would know that even if there were underwriting concerns ( more than average # of claims or the person having a certain disease) that any new claims would be proportionately paid by the first insurance company. This would mitigate the new insurance company's risk. Perhaps the first insurance company would pay 90% first three months and decreasing 10% each month there after so at the end of a year it would be totally on the new health insurance company.

Without many fundamental changes to healthcare in the US the entire system will become unaffordable. The population is aging, technology is increasing, drugs are more expensive. This type of 'insurance sharing model' is only one change that could lead to new thinking and progress toward wellness.